Lap band versus Sleeve advice
#1
Posted 19 February 2012 - 06:15 AM
Time and has a family to look after so not alot of spare time on her hands so I thought I would help her out and get some feedback... Why did you choose band over sleeve or do you know anyone with the sleeve done and how do they feel about it. I want to help Sammy make the right decision so any thing helpful to her would be great
Thanks
Jo
#3
Posted 19 February 2012 - 07:38 AM
The woman I know with the band has lost less weight over a longer time but has absolutely no regrets about getting the band and not the sleave. From what I can tell, the advantages of the sleave to the band is less maitenance (which is good for both you and your surgeon), you don't have to get stuck with a needle every few weeks, you don't have a foreign object in your body and I think people find it easier to hide having the sleave done than the band.
They held a conference on treating obesity in my town a couple of weeks ago and the sleave seemed to be the one that they were all recomending now. Not sure why the band has lost its vogue, probably because it is more upkeep. But no mater which way you lost the weight, the conference was stating statistics like 90% remission rate for obese type 2 diabetics who lost the weight and kept it off. Wouldn't matter which way you lost the weight with statistics like that!
#4
Posted 19 February 2012 - 07:52 AM
Also the stats on people with bands having to have further surgery to correct problems are so much higher than sleeve complications its actually scary
#5
Posted 19 February 2012 - 08:27 AM
Anyway interesting bit of statistics, sleeving is all the rage overseas at the moment is especially in Europe and USA, problem is that it has only been around for about 7 years and yes weight loss is faster and initally there appear to be less problems but, apparently one thing that they are starting to find is that the sleeved stomaches are starting to stretch on some patients, which requires re-sleeving the sleeve! but unfortunately 7 years is not long enough for comprehensive data.
Back to the Band, I like that fact that it is reversable, if the band does not work for you or is too troublesome, if there are problems you have it completely removed, then you have the option of having a Sleeve done. The Band has over 25 years of data behind it and the latest model of the band that has been around for about 4 or 5 years (the 10 and 14 mil ones) seems to have less problems due to a redesign than the older thin ones, as `atgreg` has said the stats are higher on bands having further surgery to correct problems, BUT remember the amount of bands out there are in the hundreds of thousands compared to the number of sleeves done and the timeframe is four times as long.
Anyway, sorry to ramble on
#6
Posted 19 February 2012 - 09:33 AM
#7
Posted 19 February 2012 - 03:50 PM
#8
Posted 19 February 2012 - 04:46 PM
atgreg, on 19 February 2012 - 07:52 AM, said:
Also the stats on people with bands having to have further surgery to correct problems are so much higher than sleeve complications its actually scary
I have started the conversation with my surgeon about getting the band removed and having the sleeve.
I am frustrated by the ongoing maintenance and the unpredictability of the band. I've enjoyed my weight loss but it has come with it's own set of problems...the first of which is that it took so damned long to find my green zone! I would also really like to eat something without fear of it getting stuck. It's thse things that I dislike about the band.
#9
Posted 19 February 2012 - 04:55 PM
Things go wrong with a lap band much more often than with the sleeve, but when they do go wrong with the sleeve, its often very serious.
#10
Posted 19 February 2012 - 06:44 PM
#11
Posted 19 February 2012 - 07:28 PM
missruthy, on 19 February 2012 - 03:50 PM, said:
Its 35, well with my surgeon anyhow. I looked into having the sleeve, but basically to cut it short im 21, havent had children and have plenty of times on my hands for appointments.
#12
Posted 19 February 2012 - 07:45 PM
#13
Posted 19 February 2012 - 08:21 PM
#14
Posted 20 February 2012 - 08:18 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users















